Archive for the ‘Web Security’ Category

Warning! March Madness Means March Malware

Friday, March 12th, 2010

By Barracuda Labs

If you’re working on your Atlantic Coast Conference brackets this week, be extra careful where you click. Cybercriminals are up to their old tricks and hoping you’ll make a fast break to their Web sites.

To raise the chances that you will, they’ve taken over popular search terms such as “ACC Tournament Schedule 2010″ and “ACC Tournament Bracket” and inserted poisoned links that lead to Rogue AV sites. SEO poisoning continues to pick up steam as attackers race to re-direct your browser to a Web site serving up various malicious programs. In this case, “CleanUp Antivirus” Rogue AV seems to be the flavor of choice.

As part of this experiment, Barracuda Labs discovered that a Google search for “ACC Tournament Schedule 2010″ returned 23 malicious links within the first 50 results. Unless you know how to tell the difference between the good links and the bad ones, you stand almost a 50% chance of having your computer taken over by “Scareware” that tries to separate you from as much as $90 for the fake software.

We discuss Rogue AV and SEO poisoning in more detail in our 2009 Annual Report released this week. The attacks are becoming increasingly more popular as hackers target vulnerabilities in legitimate Web sites, making it more likely for the page to be visited and the malicious content to be delivered. .

CNBC sites surveys that show almost 45% of American workers participate in March Madness pools at work. Much of this research is happening on company time, causing a significant decrease in employee productivity as loyal fans follow their favorite teams. While the boss may turn a blind eye to that activity, a malware infection sure won’t help your ranking at work.

Barracuda Web Filter and Barracuda Web Security Service customers are protected from this attack.

Below are screenshots that trace the attack.

Top results for ACC Tournament Schedule 2010 from Google

Top results for ACC Tournament Schedule 2010 from Google

Top results for ACC Tournament Schedule 2010 from Google

Beginning at result 11, the links all lead to malicious content.

Beginning at result 11, the links all lead to malicious content.

Beginning at result 11, the links all lead to malicious content.

When the user clicks on a poisoned link, the following page pops up briefly.

When you click on a poisoned link, this page pops up briefly.

When you click on a poisoned link, this page pops up briefly.

Next, an official-looking warning appears.

Next, an official-looking warning appears.

Next, an official-looking warning appears.

Followed by bad news, which is completely untrue.

Followed by bad news, which is completely untrue.

Followed by bad news, which is completely untrue.

The Web page wants the user to run a file. Don’t do this!

The Web page wants you to run a file.  Don't do this!

The Web page wants you to run a file. Don't do this!

If the user does run the file, the user will become infected with CleanUp Antivirus.


If you do run the file, you are infected with CleanUp Antivirus.

If you do run the file, you are infected with CleanUp Antivirus.

CleanUp Antivirus repeatedly sends you to this ‘money page’ where the user is asked to submit a credit card.

CleanUp Antivirus repeatedly sends you to this 'money page' where the user is asked to submit a credit card.

CleanUp Antivirus repeatedly sends you to this 'money page' where the user is asked to submit a credit card.

  • Share/Bookmark

Twitter’s Red Carpet Era – Celebrities and Criminals

Tuesday, March 9th, 2010

Posted by: Barracuda Labs

As part of an ongoing effort to make the Web a safer place for both business and casual users, Barracuda Labs decided to take a deeper look at one of the Web’s fastest growing social networks, Twitter. We reviewed growth drivers, usage trends and the overall crime rate, analyzing both legitimate and malicious users for 2009. Today, we published our findings as part of our Barracuda Labs Annual Report.  This report revisits an analysis completed by the team in June 2009, following the launch of TweetGrade (www.tweetgrade.com), and coincides with recent accounts of Twitter’s explosive growth – reportedly reaching 50 million tweets per day.

Our analysis is based on nearly 19 million Twitter accounts, in which we analyzed the frequency and content of tweets, user-to-user interactions, and each account’s overall activity level.

The bottom line is this: users are more active on Twitter; more users joined Twitter in 2009 following a massive influx of celebrities to the site; and sure enough, the criminals followed the users in a forceful way causing the overall Twitter Crime Rate to spike.

So let’s dig into the results…

HOW PEOPLE ARE USING TWITTER

Twitter Follower vs. Following Trends – What’s a True Twitter User?

Notably, people are using Twitter more actively. For the purpose of this exercise, we define a True Twitter User as someone who has three main attributes:

  1. Has at least (≥) 10 followers
  2. Follows at least (≥) 10 people
  3. Has tweeted at least (≥) 10 times

Interestingly, our study shows that only 21 percent of Twitter users fall within our definition parameters and are True Twitter Users.

What do we mean by “more active” on Twitter? Essentially, this means that:

  • Users are following more user accounts
  • Users are being followed back by more user accounts and more often
  • Users are tweeting more.

Today, only 17 percent of Twitter users have zero followers, which is a 40 percent increase in the number of users that now have “more” followers (i.e. ≥ 10 followers) when compared to 30 percent in June 2009.

Our analysis also found:

  • 26 percent of users now have at least (≥) 10 followers, showing a 30 percent increase since June when only 20 percent of users had at least (≥) 10 followers.
  • 40 percent of users are following at least (≥) 10 user accounts, showing an 18 percent increase since June.
  • 27 percent of users have tweeted 10 times or more, showing a 29 percent increase since June.

Additionally, today there is a trend toward users actually using Twitter as a two-way communication tool versus as an RSS feed or “information fire hose.”  In fact, 36 percent of Twitter users today have more followers than the accounts they are following, showing an 80 percent increase since June when that number was only 20 percent.

Twitter Users More Active

Not only are people becoming more connected on Twitter, they also are becoming more active:

  • 27 percent of users have tweeted at least (≥) 10 times, which is a 29 percent increase since June.
  • Moreover, today there are 34 percent of users who have not tweeted since they created an account. While that still seems like a fairly high percentage of inactive accounts, it shows an eight percent decrease (down from 37 percent) since June 2009, demonstrating that people are becoming more active.

What’s even more interesting is that the most active users on Twitter are not the ones with the most followers.

  • Users with an average of 1,000 followers actually tweet the most, as compared to those with fewer than 100 followers or more than 100,000 followers.

TWITTER GROWTH & THE TWITTER RED CARPET ERA

Further, some remarkable trends emerge as we review how Twitter’s growth has taken shape. Based on when a member joined Twitter, we plotted a Twitter growth chart. This chart illustrates a very concentrated growth spurt during the early part of 2009 – a time period which we define as the “Twitter Red Carpet Era.”

The Twitter Red Carpet Era falls between November 2008 and April 2009. This is the period of time during which a handful of ‘celebrities’ – including 27 of the top 50 and 48 of the top 100 most followed Twitter users – joined.

  • In the beginning of 2008, Twitter was growing approximately 0.31 percent per month. By November 2008, that growth increased to 1.95 percent per month.
  • After December 2008, Twitter’s growth exploded from nearly two percent per month, and rising to approximately three-to-four percent per month, before finally peaking at nearly 20 percent per month in April 2009.
  • At the end of the “Twitter Red Carpet Era,” growth appears to have normalized, dropping back to 0.34 percent by December 2009.

The following graph illustrates the Twitter Red Carpet Era and the significant impact that these celebrities had on Twitter’s growth as they brought their fan bases with them from the real world to Twitter.

TWITTER CRIME RATE

As millions of users flocked to Twitter during the Twitter Red Carpet Era, so too did the criminals. During this time, numerous accounts were used for malicious purposes such as poisoning trending topic threads with malicious URLs (hidden by the ever popular URL shortening services) aimed at luring Twitter users to sites carrying malware or other malicious content.

The Twitter Crime Rate is defined as the percentage of accounts created per month that are eventually suspended for malicious or suspicious activity, or otherwise misused.

  • In 2006, the Twitter Crime Rate was only 1.2 percent.
  • By 2007, the Twitter Crime Rate increased slightly to 1.7 percent.
  • In 2008, the Twitter Crime Rate averaged around 2.2 percent.

During the Twitter Red Carpet Era, the Twitter Crime Rate increased from 2.02 percent to 3.36 percent, showing a 66 percent increase in the overall Twitter Crime Rate.

As more users joined Twitter in 2009, the Twitter Crime Rate continued to escalate reaching 12 percent     in October 2009. This means that one in eight accounts created was deemed to be malicious, suspicious or otherwise misused and was subsequently suspended – clearly showing that the criminals do, in fact, follow the users online.

Twitter’s proactive response to keep its users’ social networking experience safe is admirable; however, it remains unclear how efficient Twitter is in detecting a malicious account.

Why should you care about how Twitter is used?

At Barracuda Labs, we’re constantly monitoring the Web ecosystem and tracking new trends in malware and other attacks.  Social networking platforms like Twitter and Facebook provide a perfect opportunity for attackers to find their victims, leveraging what users assume to be a “safe” environment. This is evident through the Twitter Crime Rate mentioned above. Attackers employ various techniques to build up their follower list, poison trending topic threads, or initiate other campaigns which can increase the visibility of their tweets, and therefore draw users in to suspicious sites, malicious downloads or other malevolent activity. As social networks continue to gain momentum – and millions of users – there is no doubt that criminals will look to create more sophisticated and serious social engineering attacks against unsuspecting users.

For a deeper dive into these social networking, Web and email attacks, download the Barracuda Labs Annual Report or feel free to drop us a line in the comments section below. We look forward to working with you to solve these problems and make the Web a safer place for corporate and casual users. Meanwhile, be sure to think twice before following someone you don’t know and check out their user profile at TweetGrade.com.

  • Share/Bookmark

Scammers Cashing in on Facebook ‘Un named’ App Hoax

Saturday, January 30th, 2010

Posted by: Barracuda Labs

On Wednesday, a seemingly harmless application listing glitch sent numerous users into believing there was a Spybot attack ongoing on Facebook. Due to the bug, an application listed as ‘Unnamed App’ appeared in some users’ application settings. Some of the users took this as the presence of a spybot which would steal their account details / passwords and perform malicious activities on their computer. Those users warned other users about it and hence the word about ‘Un named App’ spread like a fire in few hours.

Ultimately, this was a harmless bug; however, curious users turned to Google to learn more about it, and scammers saw this as a golden opportunity. The scammers soon harnessed the search query ‘unnamed app’ and poisoned search results to include sites that would redirect users to a Rogue AntiVirus serving site instead. This has become a very popular technique used by scammers in the past few months.

Clicking on search results titled ‘Unnamed App’ redirects user to Rogue AV:

Scam artists also attempted to hide from the research community by selectively redirecting only users who visited straight from Google by clicking one of the search results. Visitors (mostly researchers) who attempted to go to the malicious search result directly were redirected to http://www.cnn.com instead.

There are multiple ways to achieve this. In this case, attackers reviewed the referrer-header to check from where the user came.

Hence what was seemingly a harmless bug, was still able to perform some damage to the innocent users’ browsing experience today.

Users of the Barracuda Purewire Web Security Service are protected from this attack.

  • Share/Bookmark

Online Safety: Tips to Protect Your Information

Monday, December 21st, 2009

Posted by: Barracuda Labs

With the increased awareness and attention around incidents of identity theft, consumers are becoming more vigilant in how they provide personal information online. At the same time, businesses that require such information to complete a transaction also must evaluate how they collect that information online from consumers.

For example, a colleague recently forwarded the email below from Southwest requesting personal information to complete the Transportation Security Administration’s (TSA) Secure Flight verification. Because the email was sent after the flight reservation was booked, it was unclear to the recipient whether or not the email was legitimate. Upon examination, it is clear that this is a legitimate email from Southwest; however, it is one that could easily be forged by a spammer or hacker attempting to collect a user’s personal information.

As people are making final travel arrangements and gift purchases online in this last week leading up to the holidays, Barracuda Networks has compiled a number of tips to help consumers discern legitimate emails and Web sites from malicious attempts, as well as recommendations for businesses to better serve their consumers online.

Online consumer safety:

1. Real or fake? Do not click on links included in an email. Instead, type the address directly into your Internet browser.

2. Email security and anti-virus solutions up-and-running. Make sure you have a strong email security solution in place that can block spam and phishing emails as well as detect and block viruses and other malware (including malicious Web links) contained in the email. As an extra precaution, make sure your desktop anti-virus protection is up-to-date and running. This will keep any viruses/malware not sent over email from infecting your computer or adding you to a larger botnet.

3. Strong Web filtering. Having a strong Web filter in place will allow you to block access to potentially dangerous Web sites. Web filters can block downloads by file type and applications that access the Internet (i.e. IM, music services, etc.) that are often used by hackers as a means of transporting malware onto your computer.

4. When in doubt, check it out. If you receive an email from a business that you recently have done an online transaction with – retail, bank, airline, etc. – and are not sure of its authenticity, check it out. Call or email the business to verify that the request is legitimate. Also, you can go directly to that company’s Web site to look for warnings listed of recent Web scams that have targeted the business.

Helping businesses serve customers:
1. On-site, at-once. Request all necessary customer information at the time of purchase, while the consumer is on the Web site. In the case of the Southwest email, if the consumer had been directed to the “MySouthwest Account” to provide this information at the time of flight reservation and purchase, it would have expedited the process for the consumer and eliminated the need to send a follow up email that raised the suspicion of the recipient.

2. Avoid follow up email. Consumers are likely to be more suspicious of emails requesting that they log back into – or create – an account to provide personal information.

3. Provide clear instructions. If sending a follow up email to complete the transaction is unavoidable, provide a clear message to the consumer at the end of the initial online transaction – before they leave the Web site – so that they know to expect an email that will require additional information and what that required information will be.

4. Privacy Policy. Be sure to provide a privacy policy that’s easy to find and is clear on what the Web site will and won’t do with the information entered.

5. Protect customer information on your site. Businesses are responsible for ensuring that the customer information that it collects online is protected from those with malicious intent. Implementing a strong Web application firewall protects the business Web site from being hacked and customer information from being stolen.

The underlying goal here is to enure that businesses that legitimately require user information receive it in a timely and secure fashion. That will keep the bad guys out of consumer’s wallets and bank accounts, and from stealing their identities.

If you look at the email you will see that we have identified the hyperlinks take you to a legitimate Southwest domain. We know it is a legitimate Web site because the URL contains the Southwest domain.

  • Share/Bookmark

Yet Another Reputable Site Asks You to Install Rogue AV

Friday, December 18th, 2009

Posted by: Barracuda Labs

Yet another reputable site has fallen victim to compromise — University of Arkansas.

This Tuesday, Barracuda’s Malicious Javascript Detection engine (MJD) identified Rogue AV software being distributed from a page that belongs to the University of Arkansas Web site. When users accessed a particular page from the university Web site, it opened a window warning them about their computer being infected with viruses and then subsequently downloaded an anti-virus software which was identified to be a fake anti-virus software.

A forensic analysis of the attack revealed that the user requested the following:

hxxp://bumperscollege.uark.edu/ssp_director/inc/html/d/georgia-inmate-query.html

which in turn requested a javascript from a malicious domain via script include:

hxxp://xrusx.com/counter.php?sref=bumperscollege.uark.edu/ssp_director/inc/html/d/georgia-inmate-query.html

which contained further malicious javascript includes that generated fake warning messages on the user’s computer.

And ultimately attempted to download setup.exe:

setup.exe was linked off another malicious domain:

hxxp://www.loker.us/forum/attachments/setup.exe

While investigating deep into the tracks of the user to determine how the user got to this page, we made yet another interesting discovery. Our investigation could not find user browsing a page linking directly off Universityof Arkansas linking the malicious page that was distributing the Rogue AV. Instead, it was a Bing search result that lead user to this page. Specifically, one customer using the Barracuda Purewire Web Security Service searched for ‘georigainmatequery’ on Microsoft Bing search engine.

hxxp://www.bing.com/search?q=georgiainmatequery

Which yielded following results:

As you can see, the malicious link from uArk.edu shows up in the bing search results — and in the number two spot. The page is leveraging uArk.edu’s reputation ranking in what we’ve previously reported on as SEO poisoning (see previous post). This is becoming increasingly more popular as hackers are targeting vulnerabilities in legitimate Web sites since it makes the malicious page more likely to be visited. While search engines have been proactively adding malware scanning in their arsenal, legitimate Web site owners also need to take proactive steps to keep their site free of such malicious content.

Customers using the Barracuda Purewire Web Security Service are protected from this attack.

  • Share/Bookmark